Have you ever wondered why religious text is considered to be so sacred? Why so many people follow what is written and never seem to question the words? I have wondered this for so many years. So my question is simply this: What is it about the religious text that automatically means that is is holy or sacred? Do people take this as an exact account for their specific deity? Does anyone stop to question any of the words written, or wonder why they were written in the first place? This interested me so much that I decided to look for some answers.
We can all think of many sacred texts like The Holy Bible, The Qur'an, Mahayana Sutras, and even The Torah. Each of the religions that worship these texts all have reasons for doing so. Many people believe that these texts were written through someone as a message from that deity. But does anyone ever stop and wonder if what was written is the truth, or has it gotten a little diluted throughout the years? We can see how many people will object entirely, and wonder why I would ever pose this question. Many people have unwavering faith and would never question that, and I'm not saying that they should; however I do find it so intriguing that these questions don't come up more often. In our text for this class I came across a poem by Alfred, Lord Tennyson called Flower in the Crannied Wall (Kennedy, Tennyson, 503). This is the poem:
Flower in the crannied wall,
I pluck you out of the crannies,
I hold you here, root and all, in my hand,
Little flower--but if I could understand
What you are, root and all, an all in all,
I should know what God and man is.
This poem poses the question about God, not the scripture or text, and I find that with the author wanting to know "what God and man is" shows that even with these sacred texts in hand there are still people who wonder. We begin to wonder who is God, or whomever your deity is, and that we want to know them personally, not just through text and lectures.
With all the hype about needing to read the scriptures and follow what the sacred texts say, what about God himself? Do people get so caught up in following their texts, that in turn they forget what it is that encourages their faith? I personally think that this happens all too often, and more so than people want to admit. It is easy to get caught up in written words, and forget the purpose behind them, or whom you really worship. An article I recently read proved this exact point. It was entitled "Biblicism: Protestantims's Distinctive Form of Idolatry" by Paul E. Capetz. Capetz shared his story as a Reverend in a Protestant church whom happened to also be a gay man. After his fellow ministers found out his sexual orientation they decided to take away his leadership and have a sort of vote on whether or not he should stay ordained. The people involved in the vote consisted of both women and men, and each of these people consistently said, "But the Bible says..." and "the clear teaching of scripture." Capetz tried to make his point that at one time women did not have a say, but yet they kept on fighting for their rights as equal individuals and now they are treated as such, so therefore being gay is no different a situation. As I read on, I realized just how easy it is to get caught up in the sacred text and forget the person who you truly worship. Capetz makes a great argument for this, "God alone is to be worshipped, not the Bible." This is why I wonder why people put so much stock into scripture and sacred text, wouldn't the protestant God still love Capetz regardless of his sexual orientation? This question may be up to your own personal views, but being as I am a former Christian, I don't think God would condemn him for that.
One thing I have found in my research is that many religious texts are regarded as teachings and ways to stick with traditions from long ago. Yes, I do agree that sacred texts are a way to teach people and to learn from. But sometimes, it can go too far...at least in my opinion. I found an article that gave some insight as to sacred texts as a teaching instrument and thought it was quite interesting. The article "What is Scripture" by Steven G. Smith, argues that sacred texts teach young children the ways of life in their culture and also the traditions that come along. Smith says, "A scripture is not merely a record to be consulted at need; a community maintains a scripture in force as a teaching, an obligatory touchstone for religious thinking, whether or not customs, decisions, or experiences enjoy this status in the community also." Here is where I feel that things tend to get taken too far, if it is not enjoyed to believe in the sacred text, would your deity truly want you to regard them so highly? I understand teaching people how to act, and how to maintain their faiths, but is the scripture becoming too much? Smith again, only proves my point of scripture being taken way too far, "acknowledging scripture as a supreme authority rules out ignoring it or flatly disagreeing with it." I am not saying that scriptures or sacred texts are wrong or even bad, but I do think that many people lose sight of what it is that they worship or truly believe.
As we can see there are many reasons that people put such stock into religious text, and there is nothing wrong with valuing those beliefs. I, however, must say that I think it gets to a point where people begin to forget what they believe or whom they do worship. I think that many people do question what is written, but cannot say that due to the fear of punishment or becoming an outcast. I am glad I was able to get some of my questions answered, but I realize that most of them are personal and many people do not want to share their beliefs or criticism towards other religious texts.
But....for those of you who would like to share, here is a question for you:
Do you think that religious or sacred texts end up being the object of worship, instead of the God or deity? Do you think people stop to ponder what is written, or do they take those words as truth without any question or unwavering faith?
I think that there are people who do stop to ponder what is written in religious text. Then there are those that grow up with the religious text part of their lives and because they were taught this is how it goes, they do not question it. I don't think that people do not question the text for fear of punishment, some might, but I think that the people who go along with the text have no questions about it. They are brought up that this is the text, there is no need to question it and so they don't. People like me (who went to sunday school some as a kid, but that's about it) do question the text because we have had room to do our own thing and did not have someone telling us this is what you follow and this is how it goes. We have many questions because we have more of an opportunity to think about it instead of already thinking this it the way it was and is.
ReplyDeleteMy opinion is that the Bible or other religious texts can be considered like history books or law books. Even history books at the college level and law books are continually being changed around. They should be used just as a guide to what happenened in the past so that we can learn from the past and prevent negative events in history from repeating themselves. So, we should just take them as a guide and not as the total unwavering word of God that cannot be changed. We know the Bible has been updated many times over and interpreted by many different religious groups. And, I don't think we should punish someone based on "evidence" from the Bible or other religious texts.
ReplyDeleteHi Amber, your blog poses some very compelling questions that are difficult to answer and the topic of debate among many different groups of people. I agree that it can be hard to accept the written text in books like the bible at face value knowing that it has been interpreted and re-written many times over the centuries by different people. I tend to think that it really comes down to faith and what your religious beliefs are (or are not)Many people use books like the bible as a guide for behavior and how they should live their life, not a detailed procedure that needs to be followed to the very letter. Having said that there is certainly no shortage in history of religious extremists that have used religious books like the bible or Koran to excuse being a maniac. Take care.
ReplyDeleteI have thought (okay, I was daydreaming) what I would grab if my house caught on fire. I have all of my work from the last 15 years backed up on disks and I would grab that. After making sure all of my animals were out of the house, I would try to save as many books as I could, depending where the fire was. I have a bunch of different bible, including the standard old english, a children's bible, and an adult everyday language version. Those I would leave, because they can all be replaced. But some of my other books can not. Either they are out of print or are too old or they are so special to me that I would be devastated if they were destroyed. That does not mean I worship those books, I just love them a lot.
ReplyDeleteYour question is very thought provoking. I agree with Jason when he says that some people use their religions books as an excuse to be mass murderers or similar and that is never a good thing. Take Exodus 22:18 (one of my favorite verses): Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live. Okay so here's a good excuse to go killing witches. The bible says you're supposed to.
As a Christian, I believe in following the word of God, through the writings in the bible. I also think that some people's interpretation of it is nutso. So, even though I value the bible as a conduit to God, I am not attached to the bible itself, although the idea of a bible burning up in a fire sounds a little sacrilegious...Oops.
I think that the texts sometimes are misvalued in the sense that there are so many versions of the same thing. This illustrates that what we read isn't really black and white, but there is a lot of gray which leaves room for interpretation. Each time something is reinterpreted, there is more room for error from the original message. If ten people read the same passage, each could interpret the message it heeds in a different way. The value of what could be or could not be original seems hazy and this should be refelcted in the word's weight. The value of these texts can also sometimes be respected by non-religious parties due to their historical content. I have faith, and it is not my intent to discount any versions of any of the mentioned texts. I do, however, personally remain skeptical of the literary accountability of some of the options.
ReplyDeleteAmber,
ReplyDeleteYou pose a very big question here that many have been arguing for years. I believe that the bible that is directly translated from the original scriptures is the inherent and infalable word of God. I also believe that what is written can be used or interpreted to influence people. I don't think that most people are influenced when reading the text in a negative way but can be manipulated by some with a poor translation or interpretation.
I also think there are a lot of people out there that read the bible and do consider it to be the word of God and take it as it is written. A lot of what is written, especially in the new testament, is written in parables and therfore can be open to ones own interpretation and this is where a lot of the controversy occurs.
How do we know which interpretation is "right"? When we all read poems and stories in the Literature book we all found different meanings. This is the same thing as reading the Bible or any other religious text.
ReplyDeleteNatalie is exactly correct. Everyone is convinced that their way is the "right" way. Who can say for sure? The only thing we know is that we will find out the answers once we die. As Douglas Adams says, "...whether it's heaven, hell, purgatory or extinction, we will have the answer."
ReplyDeleteHello Amber,
ReplyDeleteI believe in the Bible. I have been going to church since I was very young. I did go astray for a while after I left the home. Here are some thoughts for you. I personally believe that the Bible is Jesus Christ in written form. So, I don't actually worship it, but believe that that is how He speaks to me, since I can't hear His voice. I also believe that I can use the principles in the Bible to live my life. Since God cannot lie, I have out many of the promises in the Bible to see for myself if they are true. I have to tell you that I haven't been let down yet. This is why I have so much faith in the written text of the Bible, because I have been able to use it as a map for my life and it works.
Very good thoughts. It has made me start thinking...Hope this answers some of your questions.
Thanks everyone for all your comments. It's been great being able to see what everyone thinks of my questions. I always found it very interesting. There are a few comments I'd like to address:
ReplyDeleteMary~ I think that you pose a great idea. That people do not stop to question things simply because they have grown up with those texts, so there is no reason to wonder about the origin. Great thoughts, and thanks!
Natalie~ I can totally agree that these specific texts can be regarded as history. I personally think that...just that everything might have gotten a little "adjusted" throughout the years. You also wrote later about "which interpretation is right" and I agree that everyone will have a different view, however what interests me about this is most religions believe what they think is correct...
So for Jennifer~ Yes, everyone is going to think this, but then why can't we all agree to disagree. Why are there so many religious feuds? Would God want us to be acting like that?
Again, thanks for all the responses and I hope to hear from more of you! Very interesting to see what everyone thinks!
Hi, Amber. I enjoyed your post and the responses it invited. As a scholar of language, I have trouble with literal interpretations of the Bible. Language is inexact because it uses words to symbolize meaning. The meaning I have in my head connected with a word may be different from the meaning someone else has. In the case of the Bible, this is complicated by translation, which makes the meaning I get potentially even more distant from the original.
ReplyDeleteI don't suppose literalist interpretations cause much trouble when people use them for their own spiritual guidance. It's when they use them against others that problems arise. In these cases, the text becomes an easy weapon. I think this behavior violates the spirit of the New Testament, which is all about love. Nancy
Nancy~ I completely agree with you! With all the translations and symbolic meaning wrapped up in the Bible it leaves much room for error and it does indeed cause me to question much of it. I also agree that many people use the Bible as a weapon towards others and this is precisely what the Bible says not to do. It's very interesting to me and I was glad to look into the topic more.
ReplyDeleteAmber-
ReplyDeleteIf this was facebook, and there was a "love" button, I'd click it! I really love the thought that you put into this and the thought it demands in return. I'm glad you brought this up and I'm glad others are responding. Personally, I believe that the Bible is taken too literally for the age we live in. I attended a presentation that my friend created for a seminar about homosexuality in the bible and it really opened my eyes. He suggested that the homosexuality found in the age of the bible was forced rape and is much different from the homosexuality found today and if the bible were to be rewritten from the mouth of God today... well it'd be much different. Some of the views presented in the bible, I hope we can all agree, are at least SLIGHTLY outdated for today's society. I don't mean to offend anyone, I promise. I just disagree with my bisexual christian friend and gay christian friend being limited to what churches will accept him and her in their services. They love God as much as any heterosexual I've ever met and they deserve to be just as happy as everyone else. Thanks, Amber [:
Sara~ I just have a hard time believing that what is written is always from God. I always look at things and then wonder "Would God really say something like that? Would he treat his people like that even though they have different characteristics than others?" I seem to have hard time accepting that he would. This is my issue with religion and religious text. Not that there is anything wrong or that people who do believe are crazy, it's just not for me anymore. I'm glad you enjoyed my post and hope that it will open the eyes of many people. :)
ReplyDelete